Historically, radical right-wing leaders have ruled many major cities on the French Riviera. Along with mass surveillance and tourist attractions, the inhabitants also face there a new regulation. Indeed, the local public prosecutor just confirmed that convicted drug traffickers will be barred from accessing social welfare.
At first glance, this new measure seems like an effective way to deter potential criminals. Thus, the region could offer improved security to its residents, including many elderly people who crave peaceful surroundings. However, to our knowledge, no study has proven that this kind of measure could effectively slow the illegal drug trade.
Is it a counterproductive measure?
In 2000, a study of “women with drug convictions or pending felony drug charges” even worsened the potential effects of this counter-incentive :
92% of the women reported that even if they had known of the ban, it “would not have acted as a deterrent during active addiction.”
Moreover, reintegration after prison isn’t ideal in France. Authorities often release convicted criminals without ensuring they have a source of income or legal opportunity. But if they can’t access social aid, they may turn to illegal activities to make money.
Cannes’ mayor, David Lisnard, also shared his own view on the matter. He explained that receiving “assistance or social housing is a benefit granted by society“. Therefore, it is “unthinkable to accept that someone who harms society should continue to receive assistance from it“.
More recognition for drug sales
Furthermore, revenues from illegal drug sales will now “be added to official resources when calculating social entitlements,” according to Ici. This is a new step towards broader recognition of this market, although it is still highly controversial in Western Europe and abroad.
The EUDA, the Union’s drug agency, reported around 7,000 deadly overdoses on the continent in 2022. Cannabis and cocaine were the most popular products, while opioids continue to kill dozens of thousands of Americans every year.
Widespread repression and censorship policies greatly influence this fatal rate. However, prevention has already proven its benefits to public health, as opposed to the risks of maintaining an international taboo.
Do you agree with this change implemented by the French judicial system?
(source)
